Dialogue with Educators


Permalink to Theatre in our Schools Month

Theatre in our Schools Month

new_tios_copy_(2)To celebrate Theatre in our Schools Month, We joined NYC teachers, teaching artists, and administrators at the American Alliance for Theatre & Education TIOS event hosted by Roundabout Theatre Company. The day was filled with presenters and panelists who spoke about ways to engage students using theatre.

Exploring Barriers to Learning

“Exploring Barriers to Learning” Session with Moderator Sobha Kavanakudiyil and Panelists Kalitchi Figueroa, Benton Greene, Nickoleta Lytras, and Aliza Sarian

SN Table

Some of our Study Guides at the StageNotes.net table

Unified Through Theatre

Unified Through Theatre’s Micaela Connery’s presentation on “Using Performance to Develop Leaders and Facilitate Inclusion”

IMG_0200

Helen Wheelock

Helen Wheelock’s “Interactive Storytelling and Emergent Literacy in the Early Childhood Classroom” presentation about approaching the Common Core Standards

Story Pirates

Benjamin Salka from Story Pirates

Story Pirates

The Story Pirates interactive presentation

 


Permalink to Q&A with Theatre Journalist Retta Blaney

Q&A with Theatre Journalist Retta Blaney

insideIn this Q&A, Retta Blaney, author of Working on the Inside: The Spiritual Life Through the Eyes of Actors, talks about her experiences as a teacher, journalist and theatre lover. Read on for suggestions on how to use her book in your Psychology, Social Studies, and Journalism classes!

How did you first get interested in theatre and Broadway?

When I was 5 I went to see my best friend, Gina, in a Children’s Theatre Association production of Mother Goose in Baltimore. I had been through a great deal of trauma and was a very frightened child. Normally I would have been terrified to be in that audience alone, surrounded by children I didn’t know, but as soon as the show started I felt safe — and happy. I remember thinking I could be like “normal” children and not afraid all the time. I was lifted out of myself and transported into the show. Theatre was my great love from them on.

When did you decide to become a journalist?

In college. Essay writing always came easy to me so I volunteered to write an article for the school paper and loved it — the reporting, the writing, seeing my name in print. I discovered my second great love. I took a couple of journalism courses and had several newspaper internships and was completely hooked
Now as a theatre writer I get to combine my two great loves!

What inspired you to write Working on the Inside?

I had been interviewing stage actors for years and was impressed by their resiliency. Few people are out of work more than actors. They are constantly holding themselves out for approval and meeting with more rejection than most of us will ever experience. I wanted to find out what kept them going.

What research did you complete while writing this book?

I read extensively before my interviews. The A-list actors like Vanessa Williams, Liam Neeson, Phylicia Rashad, Edward Herrmann and Kristin Chenoweth had considerable clip files at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, which offer most insight than information on the internet.

How can the book be used in an English class lesson about journalism for high school students?

The actors were quite open with me and shared parts of their lives they had not with other journalists. Edward Herrmann stopped our interview at one point and said, “You’re a good interviewer. You listen and you make eye contact.”

Being well prepared is crucial to conducting a good interview. Teachers can get students to imagine what questions the interviewer might have asked and how she must have followed up. Then they could assign each student the name of someone currently in the news and ask them to do their research and come back with a list of 10 questions they would ask that person if they were interviewing them.

The questions should not be ones that can easily be answered by Googling the person, such as how did you get your start? Teach the students how to go deeper. Famous people are interviewed frequently, so it’s important to work on finding a new angle and fresh questions. Show students how they can take a quote the famous person has given in the past and how they can ask new questions from it, such as: How do you feel about that now? What did you learn from that?

The point is to try to get to the inner life. Ask specific questions. Be respectful. Talk little and listen much.

When the students return to class with their 10 questions, have them take turns reading them out loud and let the other students evaluate them. If a question is good, why is it good? If not, why not and how could it be better?

How can the book be used as a tool or provide examples in a Psychology lesson? Social Studies?

Actors may not have degrees in psychology or sociology, but they probably know more about human nature than any lay person and the book illustrates that well. As Liam Neeson told me, “Actors can give a focus. They can help show another facet of life.”

They do this by taking people out of their routines, he said.

“They’re storytellers. Maybe the faith is in the repetition of these stories. They’re relived from one generation to another.

“You’re seeing a piece of heightened reality condensed into two or three hours. You get to see some person’s dilemma and ask ‘What would I do?’ or you recognize the situation they’re in. You’re comfortable with the other audience members seeing it with you. It’s a community; you’re not in isolation.”

Actors portray a wide diversity of characters, so they are in touch with a range of emotions most people will never know — how it feels to be the parent of a murdered child, or to be a murdered, or any number of experiences. As one actress said, “An actor’s training involves a lot of introspection . . . You have to find everything within yourself for an entire cast of characters of human emotions.”

As a teacher, what advice do you have for other teachers incorporating the arts into their classroom?

I taught journalism for many years on the graduate and undergraduate level, and one summer to make extra money I signed up to teach the dreaded research paper course, the second in the two-part English comp .requirement. Students in the class had put it off as long as they could and did NOT want to be there. I wasn’t thrilled about it either, but took advice from a senior professor — teach it around something you love. Since theatre is a broad subject, I built my course around my favorite contemporary playwright, Tina Howe.

The students had never heard of Howe and some had never even read or seen a play. Howe is a WASP who writes about that world; the students were mostly immigrants and minorities. Not only were plays foreign to them, so was the subject matter of the ones they would be reading all summer.

It turned out, though, to be a perfect fit. A common theme in Howe’s plays is failure to communicate, with characters talking at cross purposes and growing increasingly frustrated at not being listened to. My students could understand that. They “got it” right away.

I never had any trouble getting them to volunteer to read out loud in class, taking the parts of characters whose lives on the surface were so different from theirs. I loved listening to them, the Russian, Dominican, Polish and other assorted accents melding together into a wonderful — transformational — experience of theatre.

It was a long, hot summer in an unair conditioned classroom on the top floor under the roof — extra hot — and they actually did have to write a research paper, and I had to teach foot notes and all of that dry stuff, but they were so involved in the subject matter they didn’t mind. They made intelligent comments and comparisons of Howe’s plays. I told them they were now Tina Howe scholars, that not many people knew as much about her as they did. They seemed really proud about being scholars of something.

On the last day of class they told me how much they loved the course and how much they had been dreading it. I told them I felt the same way on both counts. It turned out to be a good summer, and the most enjoyable teaching experience I ever had. All because I brought the arts into the classroom.

What advice do you have for students aspiring to become journalists?

I don’t know about broadcast journalism, but for getting into print, clips are important, in hardcopy if possible because that still matters. I wrote for free for community papers to get clips, and tried to get as much variety as possible — news coverage, features, profiles and reviews. Propose story ideas to editors and be willing to work on spec, which means they will look at the piece but not promise to publish it. You, of course, will do it so well they will want to use it.

Follow bylines in newspapers and magazines and if a reporter is covering an area you are interested in, ask that person to have coffee with you and come prepare with some good questions to ask her or him for advice on how to break into the field. The motto in networking is, “You never know when you will meet the person who can change your life.” Someone who is a reporter today could be a hiring editor tomorrow. Plus, networking can be fun.

Always send a thank you note and then stay in touch, even after you get a job. Network should be an ongoing operation.

Retta Blaney is a theatre writer and producer in New York and the editor ofJournalism Stories from the Real World, an anthology for journalism students with an introduction by Walter Cronkite. She has taught at New York University, Brooklyn College and Marymount Manhattan College.


Permalink to Q&A with Better Nate Than Ever author, Tim Federle

Q&A with Better Nate Than Ever author, Tim Federle

nateAre you looking for a book to share with your middle school students? We suggest Better Nate Than Ever! Below is our Q&A with the author, Tim Federle, about his experiences as a performer and author and the lessons that can be learned in his debut novel.

StageNotes.net: How did you first get interested in theater and Broadway?
Tim Federle: I was never gonna be “the jock.” The only time I ever ran in gym, it was away from somebody. But then my parents took me to see the national tour of CATS. I remember thinking: “Wait, you can dress up for Halloween every night of the year and get paid for it?”

SN: When and why did you decide to write this book?
TF: I moved to New York City as a teenager to follow my Broadway dreams. (Sadly, CATS had closed by the time I arrived.) After ten years and a bunch of shows — including a memorable stint as a Christina Aguilera backup dancer at a Super Bowl — I was ready to tell a different kind of story than I had as a dancer. And it was while working with the children of Billy Elliot that I got inspired to write a book about a kid whose dreams are just a little bigger than his doubts.

SN: How much of the book is based on your personal experiences?
TF: A ton. Nate’s from a town in Pennsylvania, just like me. Also like me, he loves something that isn’t popular where he comes from. But he’s just gotta do it.

SN: In what ways has your experience as a performer on Broadway prepared you to become an author?
TF: Both are about putting yourself out there, you know? As a dancer, you’re standing onstage, performing somebody’s choreography, hoping the audience is moved. As a writer, it’s your own words, but you’re removed from the audience. The reviews trickle in. Always when you don’t expect it. Sometimes as Tweets.

SN: The book is not only an entertaining read; it is also educational as far as casting, NYC, and musicals. How is Better Nate Than Ever an introduction to Broadway for young adults?
TF: Thank you! Better Nate Than Ever takes place in the theater district — that wonderfully clanking, busy section of Times Square that used to make my head spin as a kid (and still does, for different reasons now). Nate’s adventures take him to an open audition for E.T.: The Musical, and there, I crammed everything I ever knew about how to audition for a Broadway show — especially for kids — into a little book. Also, the book is much, much cheaper than an actual trip to New York.

SN: The references to all the Broadway flops are wonderful (Starmites is actually one of my favorite musicals). Did you do any research when writing about these shows? What kind?
TF: Lots of research but also none at all. I know musicals like my older brother knows baseball. So I double-checked all the references, but I was familiar with many of the spectacular flops of Broadway. Please, I was in a few!

SN: How and why did you choose E.T. the Musical? What did that particular movie offer as the musical version in this book?
TF: We’ve all seen E.T., right? About the alien? Well, that’s how I felt growing up, in my hometown and sometimes even my own family. The outsider who just wants to get somewhere where people will understand him. And that’s how Nate feels. Plus, I was inspired by E.T.’s incredibly sensitive and wonderful portrayal of a well-meaning family just kind of barely keeping it together.

SN: How can a teacher use this book in a lesson about Life Skills? For example, lessons about bullying, following your passions, family and friend relationships, etc.
TF: Great question! Nate faces all sorts of obstacles, from bullying (for being a boy who’s into Broadway) to auditioning (he has an epic fail during his reading for E.T.). A teacher could grab a scene from nearly any chapter, have students read it/act it out, and discuss ways Nate pushed past fear and unpopularity to let his own dream rise above. I’m in the middle of an author tour right now, meeting and dancing with thousands of kids, and my message is always the same: let your dreams rise above. No matter if it’s dancing or dentistry, follow your thing and find your people — the ones who really love you. I think the book offers a non-preachy way to extract those life lessons that I used in my own career and as I helped coach the kids in Billy Elliot.

SN: Have you thought about turning Nate’s adventures into a series? Or a musical? Do you have any upcoming projects involving this loveable character?
TF: Stand by for updates! (But there’s definitely a sequel, coming out next year.)

SN: What advice can you share for students like Nate that have a love for Broadway and performing?
TF: Be nice. Nicer than you need to. To everybody. Because the talent thing? We can all train harder, work smarter, get better — but what you’re born with is what you’ve got. But the nice thing? We can all try to be nicer, and those sweet-hearted souls are always the kids (and adults) I want to work with first, on Broadway and off.

Author photo FEDERLE (1)Tim Federle’s debut novel, Better Nate Than Ever, was recently named an Amazon Best Book of the Month. Find it here, and say hi at TimFederle.com and on Twitter at @TimFederle


Permalink to Teacher to Teacher: Let the Conversation Begin!

Teacher to Teacher: Let the Conversation Begin!

On any given school day, teachers are challenged to make lessons interesting, engaging, relevant, and differentiated; and in addition, ensure that there is an alignment to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics.  I need not speak about the time constraints, budget constraints, and so many little interruptions to our instructional blocks; so what can we do, as educators, to create and deliver effective instruction?  How many times have we heard that the students are bored, or not being challenged;and better yet, have you ever played the role of sage on the stage, because you just can’t figure out how to turn a lesson into a student centered experience?

How often have you been told to make the instruction, student centered, problem based, or interactive?  How often did you think there is absolutely no way to teach a class of 25 or 30 students, except by direct instruction?

There is a solution and it is called Arts in Education; which is distinctly different than Arts Education.  What do you think that distinction might be and how can Arts in Education have an observable, measurable and positive  impact on student achievement?

What are your thoughts about going from STEM to STEAM?

Write to me and let the conversation begin!

 

Bonnie Kole, M.Ed. has taught on every level from elementary through graduate school, is a certified reading specialist, and has served as an English Department chair, curriculum supervisor and professional development designer and presenter.  A Dodge Fellow, Bonnie also works in the NYC Theatre community as an on set teacher and has produced a benefit for The Actors Fund. 

 


Permalink to Tim Federle at The Drama Book Shop

Tim Federle at The Drama Book Shop

Consider us “Federgeeks.”

Last night StageNotes went to a reading and book signing with Disney Theatrical president, Thomas Schumacher in conversation with Tim Federle, author of Better Nate Than Ever at The Drama Book Shop.

In addition to reading two sections from the book, Federle talked with Schumacher about his experiences growing up, moving to NYC, being on Broadway, and inspiration behind the novel.

Better Nate Than Ever is a heartwarming and clever story about a boy who adventures to NYC to audition for a Broadway musical. We suggest sharing this book with your Middle School students. Not only is it entertaining, it is full of great lessons about family and friend relationships, bullying, and following your dreams.

Here are some pictures from the event. Also, check out our Q&A with Federle!

026

Tim Federle and Thomas Schumacher.

The very cool Drama Book Shop

029

So many of our favorite books about theater!

031

Federle signing our book!


Permalink to Comedy for your Shakespeare Lessons (Part 2)

Comedy for your Shakespeare Lessons (Part 2)

Continued from Part 1.

StageNotes: The play heavily relies on audience involvement. Can you explain “breaking the 4th wall” and why that element was used for this show?

ShakespeareMost shows ignore their audience. At the Renaissance Faire, you had to grab the audience’s attention at the outset, and hold it throughout a half-hour performance. This is challenging enough in a traditional theater; now try it when there are busty wenches and jugglers strolling past your stage and the enticing smell of turkey legs wafting about. We’d introduce ourselves (as hammy actors with silly names, with an excuse about how the other 30 members of our troupe were down with the pox) and tell a few situational jokes to get everyone laughing. This made it clear that we weren’t presenting a traditional (potentially boring) play, but that we were charming comics hoping to make them laugh. We’d keep the audience engaged with asides and insults, dangle the threat of bringing a “volunteer” onto the stage, and make the occasional foray into the audience to loudly wake up a snoozing patron or sit on a cute gal’s (or guy’s) lap. This “no 4th wall” style makes Complete Works less of a play and more of a 3-man stand-up comedy show—which suited us just fine.

SN: Would you suggest using this play for lessons on farce and satire? How so?

Our show followed the tradition of Italian Commedia dell’Arte, from which cartoons and television situation comedies are a direct descendant. Characters are grossly exaggerated and they take misunderstandings to extremes. We just applied this formula to Shakespeare’s works. Our version of Titus Andronicus is a perfect example: we made it a crazy cooking show, but remarkably, much of Shakespeare’s original dialogue is still there! Plus, many jokes in our show are adaptable to recent/local events so that companies can customize it with satire that’s tailored to their audience.

Teachers could replicate this experience in the classroom, using different techniques of comedy and satire on a variety of classic works. Try doing a single scene from Shakespeare in several different satire formats: one group does it like South Park characters; another like a reality show; another like a cartoon superhero movie. Insist that students use most of Shakespeare’s dialogue, but let them invent and ad lib as necessary. Also, as we did, try performing a scene from a Tragedy to get laughs; or a scene from a Comedy ultra-seriously. Then discuss which works better, and why. Finally, the show could help students learn the difference between farce, satire, and parody; The Complete Works has elements of all three.

SN: What kind research did you do in writing the play?

Jess had just finished his degree at UC Berkeley where he had been studying Shakespeare extensively, so he had a lot of academic hoo-hah packed into his brain. Adam and Daniel had already performed in numerous Shakespeare productions. But none of us had an encyclopedic knowledge of our subject. So we divvied them up: Jess took the Tragedies, Adam took the Comedies, Daniel took the Histories, and we individually wrote 3-minute sketches for each play in our assigned genre. When we sat down to read through the stack together, we discovered that, as the play states to this day, “The Tragedies are much funnier than the Comedies.” The Comedies were all too similar; we couldn’t keep them apart in our heads. It was then that we had the idea to condense all the Comedies into a single play that highlighted the all the recycled plot devices. Likewise with the Histories, condensed into a football game. There are still a few of those original 2-3 minute versions of the Tragedies left largely intact in the show today: Titus Andronicus, Macbeth, and Julius Caesar, to name a few.

SN: How can this play be used in Shakespeare lessons? For example, how can it portray themes like “the shipwreck, the identical twins, and the big wedding” for a variety of plays.

We don’t put a whole lot of “educational” value on our show; it’s intended strictly to entertain. That being said, the lesson that Shakespeare can be entertaining is a good one in and of itself. The points we chose to make even our abridged telling of the tales might be a signpost to the most essential elements of a particular play. As your question suggests, the Comedies is perhaps the most educational section of the show. The suggestion that Shakespeare “borrowed and adapted” plot devices freely begs the question: from whom did he borrow (Roman literature and drama, mostly), and which devices? And who, in turn, borrowed from him? How many Disney movies can you name that begin with a shipwreck and/or end in a wedding? And then there’s The Lion King

SN: What made you spend more time with the plays like Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet?

The honest answer is that we already had 20-minute versions of these two plays in our repertoire when we decided to stage The Complete Works. We figured we simply needed to spend another 20 minutes on “the other 35” plays to have a show long enough to take to Edinburgh. But in practice, the show works well with its greater focus on these two plays because they’re probably the two works of Shakespeare that a general audience is most familiar with; and in order for parody or satire to work, the audience MUST know the target being made fun of. That’s why there are countless send-ups of Romeo and Juliet; none of Timon of Athens.

SN: What advice do you have for students who would like to write their own plays based on classical works?

First, know the source material… and not just by reading the Cliff’s Notes! As you read the source, note what seems ridiculous about it; archaic concepts, big plot holes, verbose dialogue, characters that seem outdated or over-the-top. And then think about what modern parallels it reminds you of. Does Grendel in Beowulf remind you of The Terminator? What if the Ancient Greeks of The Iliad were modern “Greeks” on sorority row at a party college, and the Siege of Troy was a panty raid? Let your mind freely associate. What if A Tale of Two Cities wasn’t about how the French Revolution affected characters in Paris and London, but the gay marriage movement affecting characters in San Francisco and Tehran? What if Shakespeare himself appeared in… the Wild West? Gangland Chicago in the 1920’s? A South Park episode?

And of course such plays needn’t be satire or parody, nor even comedy. There are all sorts of prequels and sequels to be written. What were all the ups and downs of Hamlet and Ophelia’s relationship before the action of Hamlet? There’s a triple wedding at the end of A Midsummer Night’s Dream… how did those marriages work out? The possibilities are endless! Read the original with curiosity and an open mind, and remember that good parody and satire should reveal something new and meaningful about both the parodist (or satirist) and the Classic Work being parodied (or satirized).

So: go forth, get a good understanding of what you’re going to make fun of, and be clever! You’ll be joining the ranks of countless writers who’ve used classical works to inspire modern ones, just as Shakespeare himself did.


Permalink to Comedy for your Shakespeare Lessons

Comedy for your Shakespeare Lessons

In The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (abridged) [revised], authors Jess Winfield, Daniel Singer, and Adam Long took Shakespeare’s classic works and created a script based on audience participation, improvisation, and pop culture references to entertain with a comedic production. The play can be a great tool when discussing improvisation in acting class, literary devices like satire in literature class, or adding some clever humor to a Shakespeare lesson. In a Q&A with StageNotes, authors Daniel and Jess discuss their experience writing and performing the show.

StageNotes: What were your favorite subjects in high school and why?

Daniel: Drama, Concert Choir, Yearbook, Art, English. The arts classes were great because we learned by DOING. Studying English gave me practical writing skills that I use every day. Touch Typing was probably one of the most helpful classes of my entire life.

Jess: English, European History, and P.E. (I was on the basketball team until my Junior year). I enjoyed Drama, but gave it up in favor of the Forensics (speech) team. Same idea of developing skills in performance, delivery, comic timing and the like, but more fun travel, days off from school; plus I knew I’d have a great role because I was choosing the material myself. And I wouldn’t have to deal with other pesky actors: I would play ALL the roles!

SN: How did you first become interested in Shakespeare?

ShakespeareDaniel: My 8th grade class read Romeo & Juliet aloud and I instantly loved the verse form of the dialogue. The rhythmic language appealed to me and I didn’t have any problem understanding it. When the BBC filmed all of Shakespeare’s plays in the late 1970’s I watched them all and thought, “Some of these plays are fantastic! (Others, not so much!)” While studying drama in London, I saw everything the Royal Shakespeare Company did. They were so adept at finding clever techniques to make the old plays feel new. Their modern-dress Taming of the Shrew with Jonathan Pryce blew my mind.

Jess: I’d only had the requisite curriculum in Shakespeare (R&J, Midsummer Night’s Dream, and Henry IV Parts 1 and 2) and hadn’t been wowed by any of it. Then two actors from the Ashland Shakespeare Festival came to perform for our drama class. They did a couple of Shakespeare scenes (which ones, I don’t recall), but they also did a bit of the game of “Questions” from Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, which prompted me to buy a copy of the play immediately. As it happened, my English class was just starting Hamlet. I found the interplay between the two works exhilarating. So in a way, my entrée to Shakespeare has always been via the backdoor of parody and satire… and Tom Stoppard.

SN: You mention in the notes that the play was originally developed through improvisation and ad lib. Can you please explain how the play came to be?

Daniel grew up in Santa Rosa CA, just up the road from the original Renaissance Pleasure Faire in Marin County. He’d worked there as an actor in the late 1970’s. After drama school, he sent the Faire a proposal to produce a half-hour Hamlet – all Faire entertainment was scheduled in half-hour timeslots. There was a surprising lack of Shakespeare in their offerings so they gave the show a green light. Tom Stoppard’s Dogg’s Hamlet had proven that an abbreviated version of the Prince of Denmark’s tragic tale was both easy to follow and comical in its sheer brevity, so it seemed like a natural. Daniel’s script was originally just a reduction of the play with no jokes in it.

Two of the actors Daniel hired, Jess Winfield and Adam Long, were brilliant young comics. We were all strongly influenced by the antics of the Marx Brothers, Bugs Bunny, and Monty Python. Our Hamlet became a showcase of broad humor and personal interactions between the actors. This allowed the audience to enjoy the show on multiple levels: the cleverness of seeing the greatest play in the English language rudely compacted into an absurdly short skit; the delight of vaudeville-style slapstick adapted to a 16th-Century idiom; and the witty interplay of three charismatic guys struggling to get through the damn thing.

Our version of “developed through improvisation” was perhaps different from what people might imagine: actors going into a rehearsal room, having a director give them characters and a situation, and inventing dialogue which then becomes the script of the show. Not us! Our improvisation was born of necessity during performances. Our “innyard stage” was hot, dusty, noisy and full of distractions. Holding an audience’s attention was unusually challenging. Drunken hecklers, intrusive parades and backstage confusion forced us to ad lib bits that frequently became permanent elements of the script. When Juliet can’t find a proper balcony on the set, she climbs a tree or onto somebody’s shoulders. Voila!

Over the next few years we added other shows into our repertoire and fine-tuned our material until finally, in 1987, we debuted our absurdly ambitious The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (Abridged) at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, where it was hailed as a work of genius. That was followed by two years of touring the show around the world and eventually a ten-year run in London’s West End. We never stopped tinkering with the script, including 20 years after its debut, when we wrote a major revision to reflect all the cultural changes the world had experienced since 1987.

SN: How would you suggest teachers to use improvisation and ad lib in their classrooms?

A great deal of theater is boring because actors take turns spouting their lines in a mechanical fashion that’s completely unlike real conversation. We hated that. We wanted our show to always feel spontaneous, as if the things that happened onstage were always a surprise to us as well as to the audience. To achieve this, you have to always be present – watching and listening and thinking and reacting to your fellow actors. Improv was the tool that forced us to keep things fresh. Traditional improv exercises are great practice, even if you’re not very good at them – because they train actors to stay present in the moment and not fall into a performance rut.

Continue to Part 2…


Permalink to Q&A with Bruce Miller

Q&A with Bruce Miller

Author, associate professor, and teacher Bruce Miller shares his experiences and inspirations behind his book Actor’s Alchemy: Finding the Gold in the Script. Want to use the Actor’s Alchemy in your class? Check out our Teaching Tips!

actorsalchemyStageNotes: What was your favorite class in high school and why?

Bruce Miller: Well for me, it was always English class. I had no idea in high school that I was going to end up being an actor. I went to an academic high but it was academic and sports. Even if I had the inclination to do theater in high school, I probably would have needed a really strong arm to pull me on to doing it just because of the social pressure amongst the guys at my all guys’ school.

SN: What made you first get interested in Broadway and theater?

BM: I’m a certified secondary English teacher and I taught for three years and during that time I did a community theater production. I was always a lead or director in the camp show as a kid. That was a safe venue to do theater and I always loved it. In my first teaching job, which was middle school, I got called on to direct the middle school production of Arsenic and Old Lace and I had no clue what I was doing. Apparently, I did it better than most. That was my first toe in the water.

I taught high school English for four years and I went back to graduate school for Journalism. I wanted to be a television journalist and in order for me to take the graduate class I needed, which was Journalistic camerawork, I needed a prerequisite. The undergraduate journalistic prerequisite was full so they told me to take an acting class. Because I was a little older, the guy who taught the most advanced BA undergraduate scene study class said “Come on in, you’re smart. Work with these guys.”  Without any previous training or classes, I went into the highest level scene study class and I was no worse than anybody else. Then I applied to grad school at the same school which was Temple University, they had a very good graduate program. I had no idea what I was doing and I didn’t get in.

I was so interested at this point that I went to find out what I would need to do in order to be good enough. I bumped into a woman who I had a graduate course with and she turned out to be the wife of the director of the acting conservatory and she spoke to her husband. Another long picaresque series of events-it seems like destiny in hindsight-I got into this program I didn’t deserve to be in. Within the three years of graduate school, I caught up, I guess, and I learned how to do some stuff.

When I left, the one big issue that everyone was talking about was my “technique” and my “toolkit.” Most of us didn’t really have a technique. Ironically, it was a really good acting program by reputation but none of us left with a solid background. It wasn’t until I was acting in NY and found some other teachers that I really learned to put together that thing called technique. Except for one really good teacher who had a tremendous influence on me, on all of us.

I dedicated my teaching career to making it [acting techniques] simple and clear. And so nothing I teach is original, other than maybe my definition of good acting, but everything else is just basic late Stanislavsky but articulated to the lowest common denominator and through repetition, it seems to work.

SN: Can you define technique for our readers?

BM: Technique is an actual systematic set of tools and a process by which you approach scripted material.

SN: What were some inspirations for writing the Actor’s Alchemy?

BM: When you write things, it becomes more tangible, more three-dimensional, and more solid. I think as I have went through the series of books that I have written, I more and more come to rely on and believe that analysis is the stepchild of the acting child process but really, it is one of the most tangible and useful things that we can, as acting teachers, teach, but that is the least studied thing in an acting class. Everyone wants to teach listening and reacting and emotional depth, but, knowing what you’re doing in terms of storytelling is critically important and there’s always this assumption that you’re going to learn this on your own, but it’s something that most people don’t do solidly. They tend to generalize throughout their student years. I didn’t learn craft-to the point where it was tangible and useful-until I started teaching because then I was responsible for being clear to other people rather than just telling myself I knew what I was doing.

SN: You give a map for analyzing a script in the book. How does that differ than the analysis of Literature?

BM: In English class, if you’re a serious student of literature, the last thing you want to see on a test or spend a lot of time on in discussion in the classroom is plot because plot is well you read it, you know the plot, you don’t want to sit on that. Let’s talk about the meaning. Let’s talk about who these characters are and what they say about the human condition. That’s what you do in an English class. As an actor, you say “what is the conflict? “What are the actual plot progression steps? Where are the big moments? What is my character fighting for? –These are all plot related questions, which, in the English class, if the class has read the book, everybody got it. But, they get it in a general sense and they don’t have to repeat it in performance on stage or make it clear to an audience. In English, we tend to shuck off that plot stuff where, that is really our focus when we are storytellers as actors and directors and storytellers and those things that we shucked off become the focus.

Bruce Miller (Miami, FL) is a professor and the director of acting programs at the University of Miami, where he teaches acting and script analysis. His more than 100 articles on acting appear regularly inDramatics Magazine and Teaching Theatre. Miller has conducted acting workshops nationally and internationally, including a series for the Educational Theatre Association’s Professional Development Program. He is the winner of the EDTA’s Founders Award given for lifetime achievement in educational theatre. Miller is a member of AEA, SAG, AFTRA, and holds an MFA in acting from Temple University. He is the author of The Actor as Storyteller, The Scene Study Book, Acting Solo, and Actor’s Alchemy (all published by Limelight Editions).


Permalink to Teaching Suggestions with Actor’s Alchemy

Teaching Suggestions with Actor’s Alchemy

Here are three teaching tips to help incorporate Acting into your classroom!

We used Actor’s Alchemy: Finding the Gold in the Script  by Bruce Miller as our inspiration.

actorsalchemy

  • Have your Creative Writing students read Chapter 5 “Sifting for a Character” before they begin working on a play.

“So many good playwrights have an acting background because they deal with conflict and in action and that’s the basis of storytelling.”-Bruce Miller         

  • Read Bruce’s exercise “Listening and Reacting to Written Material” in Chapter 10. Have your students pick a news article in their Social Studies class and practice listening and understanding.

One of the things that we do even if we listen, is we distill everything we hear in terms of our very strong previous beliefs and we don’t even really necessarily  hear what’s being said, we hear what we think in reaction to what was said because our preset is so strong.” –Bruce Miller

  • Read the emotion challenge at the beginning of Chapter 2, “Mining for Physical Action”. Have your students try the activity before transitioning to a lesson about universal expression of emotion in your Science or Psychology class.

“In life we pick up on the cues of what other people are really thinking and feeling. Not only by what they say, but by how they say it and body language.” –Bruce Miller

 


Permalink to Voice and Speech Training Today by Nancy Saklad

Voice and Speech Training Today by Nancy Saklad

One of the most important tools for both an actor and a teacher is their voice. In her book Voice and Speech Training in the New Millennium: Conversations with Master Teachers, Nancy Saklad shares interviews that detail the vocal training process.

nancy

Voice and speech training today is a far cry from the elocution training of the 19th century with its cookie cutter, perfectly shaped vowels and predetermined patterns of inflection. Today’s training does not uphold a single “standard” for all actors to learn (except perhaps a standard of vocal health and safety.) Rather, today’s voice and speech training provides tools for freeing the actor’s instrument and expanding the actor’s expressiveness. It is not considered separate from actor training but instead a means of evoking performances that are rich in clarity, variety, spontaneity, emotional and intellectual expressiveness and safe for the actor’s instrument. This type of training directs the actor’s awareness to the sensation of the ever-changing moment and so keeps him in the moment with this point of focus.

My students are often surprised when an exercise in vocal variety, for instance, can suddenly evoke an unexpected emotional response or result in a playfulness that unlocks new meaning in the text. They crave organicity—techniques that elicit an organic response or sensation that is unique to each actor and unique to the moment as opposed to 19th and early 20th century training which directed the actor to a specific result, a specific tone or dialect standard. Instead of revering the “voice beautiful” we now seek to liberate and celebrate the “voice individual” capable of expressing the uniqueness of the actor through integrated training born of the idea that today’s voice and speech training teaches acting through the voice.

Nancy Saklad is an Associate Professor at the State University of New York at New Paltz. In addition to teaching she is a professional voice and dialect coach and director.

Page 1 of 512345